Link 7 Apr Just finished this - great book, recommended»
Link 7 Apr 149 notes The decline of the mobile web»

cdixon:

People are spending more time on mobile vs desktop:

image

And more of their mobile time using apps, not the web:

image

This is a worrisome trend for the web. Mobile is the future. What wins mobile, wins the Internet. Right now, apps are winning and the web is losing.

Moreover, there are…

Link 18 Jul 45 notes How things get done»

parislemon:

Sam Altman:

Most early-stage startup founders do a bad job of getting the company to focus on just two or three critical priorities—they chase whatever shiny new object appears that day.  This is somewhat expected—the sort of people that start companies generally like doing new things, not executing relentlessly on the same things.  But restraint is critical.  It’s very easy to justify taking on one more project by saying that it won’t be that time consuming.  Unfortunately, it will likely either be time consuming, or it won’t be worth anything.  Most founders know what to do; they just don’t know what not to do.

via ParisLemon.
Link 6 Jul 37 notes An Unstoppable Climb in C.E.O. Pay»

parislemon:

Gretchen Morgenson:

Among the few companies to include an executive pay performance measure based on innovation is 3M, Mr. Van Clieaf said. Its “New Product Vitality Index” measures the percentage of the company’s total sales from products introduced in the last five years. “They recognize that to have sustainable growth and value, they must continue to be an innovation company,” he said.

Intriguing idea.

via ParisLemon.
Link 3 Oct Evemi's latest re-design looks great»

A start-up I’m working with recently launched an extensive re-design, which you can view by signing up at Evemi.com.

The idea behind Evemi is not too dissimilar to my own co-founded site, which’ll be launching soon, Croon.fm. Whilst Croon is solely focussed on music, Evemi caters for an unlimited set of interests. The basic idea? They want to re-invent the forum, providing a more efficient, intuitive and modern solution to the problems that forums previously solved to a lesser degree. 

You go on Facebook to keep in touch with friends. You go on Twitter to get updates on what’s going on in the world. You go on Pinterest to collate an online scrapbook of inspiring images and videos. We want you to use Evemi to connect with people around your interests and passions, whatever they happen to be.

There’s still tons of work to do before Evemi reaches it’s full potential, but it’s really exciting to see the rate of learning and progress being made to the site by it’s fantastically talented and driven founder, Paul. I can’t wait to see where it’s going to be in another 3 months. 

Text 28 Jul Slowly but surely, humans and computers are on a collision course

At their developer conference a few weeks ago, Google announced their highly anticipated Google Glasses will be released to the public sometime next year. This came as a surprise to some who assumed the Glasses were just another example of Google’s futuristic Project X products that are probably years away from actual release (see Google Cars). Watching the original demo video, the glasses look like the natural progression from smartphones and it’s hard not to see this as the future.

The glasses themselves invoke a strong resemblance to the lenses that appear in the final episode of Charlie Brooker’s excellent 3 part Black Mirror series from late last year, ‘The Entire History Of You’. In the show, the characters have tiny computers implanted behind their ears that work with contact lenses to capture and record all the moments in their life, giving them the ability to access and re-live their past memories on demand. The episode focuses on the negative emotional repercussions of this ability on the characters lives, as they obsess over memories instead of living life in the present.

“We think technology should work for you—to be there when you need it and get out of your way when you don’t”, explained the Google Glass team in a post announcing project Glass. It’s a goal that sounds harmless enough, and is a sentiment repeated by tech titans past and present, from Steve Jobs to Jack Dorsey. But what’s the end goal of this ambition? We are on track to make technology a seamless, natural experience within our daily life.  These innovators don’t want to make technology a separate ‘thing’ that we turn to when we need it; rather, they want to immerse it into the fabric of our lives until it becomes part of us - the ultimate frictionless, intuitive and personal experience.

Google Glass marks the latest step in a trend that’s seeing the physical space between humans and computers diminishing; from desktop computers that we left on desks, to laptops that we could travel with, to smartphones that we carry everywhere, and now Google Glasses that’ll we’ll have permanently placed in front of our eyes, allowing us to take pictures, record videos and get directions to the train station without clicking a button. Inevitably, innovation dictates that contact lenses are likely to replace glasses soon after. And before we have time to consider the consequences, there we’ll be, living in Charlie Brooker’s imagined future, spending our lives repeating recorded life-like memories from our past. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. With Google Glass and future iterations, our tech will have much more functionality than the simple ability to record and play videos from your life, and that’s why our almost inevitable slide into this future could have such a profound and far reaching effect on human evolution.

There’s plenty of things that computers can do much better than us and tech giants such as Apple and Google are currently ensuring we can take advantage of this through our phones. Trying to remember a fact you learnt? Google it. Trying to calculate a maths sum? Use a calculator app. Trying to figure out what restaurant to go to tonight? Ask Siri. Now Imagine if all the useful applications you get from your smartphone were readily available within your head via a chip.

But that’s not all. The big innovation that will make this technology so seamless is the twin advancements of visual and voice recognition software, giving this technology the intelligence to absorb and react to our environment without us having to give any instructions. Already, plenty of progress is being made; Siri and Google Now in voice recognition and Facebook/Google’s in visual recognition. It won’t be long till your computer will be able to recognise who someone is by mapping their face, then understand what they when they speak to you and provide an appropriate response. Someone will be able to have a whole conversation with you, without your brain being involved at all. They’ll just be talking to your Siri.

In books and films that imagine a future society, human evolution stays static whilst robots become ever more ingenious, powered by tech innovation. But evidence seems to be pointing to a different future. Whilst moore’s law ensures technological innovation continues to accelerate, tech breakthroughs are being passed onto improving our own lives rather than advances in robotics, where progress has been painfully slow.

What seems most likely is that we’ll slowly become a hybrid between the two; a computer enhanced human. Who needs robots that feel, when we’re perfectly capable of feeling ourselves? Rather than a future where we try to create robots that replicate ourselves, we’ll take the aspects that computers are better at and utilise these things to improve ourselves.

All the technologies I’ve mentioned are in development and are progressing rapidly, and in isolation each of these innovations aren’t too far away from where we are now. However, combined, these could have devastatingly powerful effect on humanity - the long term effects of which could be far reaching and potentially harmful.

We could be faced with a future where we outsource our brains when it comes to logic, memory and data processing. What would be the point in improving our memory, remembering a recipe, or learning math, when our heads can do it automatically from birth using our iLens? Technology is already changing the way our brains work. This effect would be greatly amplified if similar technology was contained within our bodies.

It’s a well known saying, ‘software is eating the world’. Will it eat us, from the inside out?

Link 4 Jul This is great»
Video 27 Jun

The difference between those that dream and those that do, according to Steve Jobs.

Video 25 Jun

This is a brutally cringe-worthy interview. TechCrunch writer Alexia Tsosis has received some flak for her interview technique here, but really I just think she’s asking honest, albeit critical, questions about the service. What makes the interview so embarrassing is how badly Klout Founder Joe Fernandez’s answers her questions.

What I find most frustrating about Klout is the technology they’re building could be applied in a much more useful and more valuable way.

To truly fulfil it’s potential, Klout needs to alter it’s current focus of providing a narcissistic tool that allows people to measure their personal influence, and become a service that matches and recommends you with people to follow on social media channels based on similar interests and the quality of content they produce. If it built on its current technology to crack people recommendation and discovery on interest based social networks like Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram, etc, Klout could well become an attractive acquisition target for one of these sites, or maybe even Google (essentially, Klout would be the ‘Google for People’ in this scenario anyway).

But from the way the Klout Founder talks about the service, it seems their main goal is instead to help people measure and track their own influence on social media. I can’t help thinking they’re missing a trick here.

Video 21 Jun

Apple has long been encouraging consumer web companies to create dedicated iPad and iPhone apps that take advantage of their unique form factor, and you only have to compare the excellent LinkedIn iPad app with it’s web equivalent to see how much better the UX is on dedicated apps.  So why haven’t Apple adapted Safari to optimise for iPad and iPhone, instead of simply replicated the UI of Safari for Macs? Perhaps the lack of investment in Safari is part of Apple’s desire to destroy the web and make apps the standard online experience, all accessible through Apple’s walled garden, the app store. Or maybe not.

Nevertheless, innovation on tablet and mobile browsers has been badly needed for a while. And that’s why it’s brilliant news that Mozilla are working on a dedicated iPad browser called Junior. From the looks of the demo Junior appears slick, intuitive and it’s evident Mozilla have put a lot of thought into it. Cool features include the the replacement of text tabs with a full visual of the screens you’ve left open, within a home screen that also shows your regularly visited sites in a visual layout so you can easily get the sites you like within one click.

I can’t wait until this is released. 


Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.